Back to Insights

Using the Time Dimension in Software Development

Most delivery plans assume a straight line. Real delivery rarely behaves that way.

Many teams are uncomfortable using time as an explicit control surface. They expect Phase 1 → 2 → 3 in sequence, and anything else feels "illogical." In practice, the fastest path to outcomes is often non‑linear: build a platform layer now, leap forward to a Phase‑5 capability to unblock a dependency, ship it behind a flag, then return to Phase‑1 groundwork. Done deliberately, this compresses lead time and removes organisational blockers without sacrificing quality.

Below is a pragmatic playbook: when to bend time, how to do it safely, and what guard‑rails to keep in place.


When to deliberately go out of order

  • Dependency management. Team B depends on an API or schema that isn't scheduled until later. Deliver the contract + stub early so they can build in parallel.
  • Political or stakeholder sequencing. A visible win (e.g., a Phase‑5 feature) earns air‑cover for the foundational work.
  • Commercial imperatives. A specific component is needed now for market, funding, or regulatory reasons; surrounding services can be stubbed or simulated temporarily.
  • Risk burn‑down. Attack the highest unknowns first (security boundary, data model fracture, performance ceiling) even if they "belong" to later phases.
  • Integration unblocking. Stand up a production‑safe facade so middleware and partners can begin end‑to‑end testing.

The heuristic: Unblock the most people with the least irreversible work.


Core idea: The Temporal Architecture Map (TAM)

Create a one‑page view that treats time as a dimension you can shape.

TAM contents

  1. Outcomes & constraints. Why we're reordering; what must remain true (security, data privacy, uptime).
  2. Invariants. Interfaces, IDs, data contracts, auth model — the pieces you commit not to break.
  3. Phase‑jump slice. The minimal vertical slice we will ship out of order (often an interface + thin implementation).
  4. Guards & toggles. Feature flags, API versioning, kill switches, rate limits, circuit breakers.
  5. Temporal debt ledger. The follow‑ups we owe the system later (with owners and dates).
  6. Exit criteria. Objective signals that the jump achieved its goal (e.g., Team B can integrate; stakeholder X unblocked).

The playbook (7 steps)

  1. Name the unblock. Write a single sentence: "We will do X early so Y can happen immediately."
  2. Lock the invariants. Freeze the things that cannot change (e.g., /v1/loans/{id} contract, auth scopes, ID formats). Use contract tests.
  3. Define the thin slice. Skeleton API/GUI, mocked dependencies, happy‑path only, observable from day one.
  4. Wrap with guards. Ship behind flags; add kill switch; cap traffic; isolate the new feature's blast radius.
  5. Instrument aggressively. Traces, logs, SLOs. If it moves, measure it.
  6. Document the temporal debt. What will be reworked? Who owns it? By when? Put it on the roadmap, not in someone's memory.
  7. Close the loop fast. After unblocking, return to the paused phase and complete the missing groundwork.

Treat a phase‑jump like a surgical strike: small, precise, well‑instrumented, and fully reversible.


Worked examples

  • Platform → Phase‑5 → Backfill. Build the identity layer for a finance portal, leap to a Phase‑5 broker upload function to unlock partner testing, deploy it behind a flag, then return to Phase‑1 data foundations and Phase‑2 workflows. Middleware now progresses in parallel.
  • Team‑B dependency inversion. Team B needs a ledger API scheduled for Phase‑3. Publish the contract and a read‑through stub now; they develop against a stable facade while Phase‑1/2 continue. Swap the stub with the real implementation later without breaking consumers.
  • Commercial deadline. A demo or investor milestone requires one working journey (apply → decision pack). Build that vertical thin slice end‑to‑end; surround with mocks; keep interfaces stable; fill the rest afterwards.

Guard‑rails that make it safe

  • Versioned contracts. Design for /v1 longevity; add non‑breaking fields first; only bump versions for genuine breakage.
  • Feature flags everywhere. Per‑tenant, per‑role flags let you ship early and narrow exposure.
  • Observability first. Logs, traces, metrics tied to business IDs (application IDs, broker IDs).
  • Operational run‑books. If you ship it, you can roll it back. Keep mitigation steps documented and tested.
  • Security invariants. AuthN/AuthZ, PII handling, and audit trails are never temporal; they're table stakes.
  • Temporal debt ledger. A visible list of shortcuts (and their owners/dates) prevents "temporary" from becoming "forever."

Anti‑patterns to avoid

  • Invisible stubs. Shadow systems that nobody knows are temporary. Always label and log.
  • Coupling via convenience. Hard‑wiring early code to mocks so tightly that the real system can't plug in later.
  • Rewriting interfaces casually. Phase‑jumps do not justify churn on IDs/contracts. Stability beats neatness.
  • Big‑bang catch‑up. If the ledger has dozens of overdue items, you're accruing temporal debt faster than you can pay it down.

Metrics that matter

  • Blocked‑days burned (how many days of downstream waiting disappear).
  • Dependency lead time (commit → usable contract) for consuming teams.
  • Flow efficiency (active time ÷ total time) for the critical path.
  • Rework ratio (changed/rewritten code within N weeks of the jump).
  • SLO adherence and error‑budget spend for phase‑jump features.
  • Flag lifetime (how long a feature stays gated before full release).

FAQ

Isn't this just "cutting corners"?

No. It's a way to sequence value while protecting quality with invariants, flags, and observability.

What if stakeholders think it's illogical?

Make the logic visible: write the unblock statement, publish the invariants, and show the TAM. People accept non‑linearity when they understand the why and the risk controls.

Where does AI help here?

AI accelerates the thin slice: scaffolds, contract tests, mapping, and docs — so the jump is days, not weeks.


Closing thought

Linear plans are comfortable; value is rarely linear. Use time as a tool: jump forward to unblock, then come back and finish the foundations. Do it with discipline, and you'll ship sooner, de‑risk earlier, and keep everyone moving.

Ready to plan a phase‑jump?

Talk to an Architect Talk to an AI Expert